Those who deny that evolution was the method by which we became human have to come up with convoluted "research" to fit their supernatural belief into known, proven facts (earth's age, fossils, genetics).
Their arguments sound perfectly reasonable to the ignorant. I, personally am not able to refute them.
But many, many others can and have. NONE of the arguments presented below have EVER been subjected to the standard techniques of science (observe, hypothisize, write, peer review, publish, present) in reputable journals. <br>
I make this statement because none of them point to articles published in reputable journals and you know they would be happy to point out a peer-accepted journal article that
While I may not have specific rebuttals to the nonesense presented below, I rest my case based on the overwhelming evidence presented above.
They have been published ...and peer reviewed ... in Creationist journals.
While legitimate researchers are pushing forward with research that takes them... they don't know where, Creation "Scientists" are busy trying to find scientific evidence that refutes all of nature.