Nonsense of Noah


9.1. The Departure
Genesis


Genesis 8:15 And God spake unto Noah, saying,
Genesis 8:16 Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee
Genesis 8:17 Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth.
Genesis 8:18 And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him:
Genesis 8:19 Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark.



THE POINT!
There was no way for these animals to survive after leaving the Ark. The land would have been a sodden muddy swamp - just like New Orleans after Katrina


.

Koalas

They live only in Australia. Their diet is so restricted--to a few subspecies of eucalyptus--that they're threatened now by destruction of the only kinds of trees they will eat. It's also hard to imagine them migrating. Over many generations they might slowly spread through an area--but travelers, they ain't.

And when they did migrate over 9,000 miles, in a tiny herd from Ararat to New South Wales, eating a convenient trail of long-disappeared eucalyptus (which took how many years after the Flood to grow?), they left no trail of koala fossils behind.

A suggestion for creation "researchers": put together a real research expedition! Find the trail from northern Turkey to Australia. Find those fossilized eucalyptus leaves, koala footprints, and koala bones. While you're at it, turn up a few kangaroos, giant moas, marsupial lions, Tasmanian wolves, and platypuses along that superhighway to the South Pacific.

Just Curious:None of the Animals died during the year? A miracle!

The animals had to eat on the way back. If they wouldn't have had to eat, God would not have instructed Noah to take food on board.
SO... they had to have food on the way back.

There would have been no plants after the ground had been submerged for nearly a year. God did not just regenerate the vegetation. If he instantly regenerated the vegetation, than what was the point of saving two animals and eight humans. He could just as easily regenerated them too.

What would the carnivores have eaten? Whatever prey they ate would have gone extinct.

THE POINT!
The trip back to "Native Lands"

Why woulid the animals even want to return to their native habitat? If they were able to survive in the area near the Ark, there would have been no reason for them to return to the homeland. Animals are not sentimental.

And how did the New World monkeys or the Australian marsupials or the Polar Bears of the Artic or the Emperor Penguins of the Antartic find their way back after the flood subsided? Especially if, according to Ark Apologists, the earth now had oceans and mountains. The geography would have been entirely different from when they entered the Ark.

.
WAIT - THERE'S MORE!
Listen to this...

Genesis

8:20 And Noah builded an altar unto the LORD; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar



What the....???
He killed and burned every clean beast and every clean fowl? What's left?

Just Curious:What evidence is there that all species originated in Turkey?
None. But that's what the record should look like if the Ark landed on Mt. Ararat.